P1-SIR-05 The life and importance of the Prophet ﷺ Paper 1, Question 3

The rebuilding of the Ka‘ba and the Black Stone

A dispute during the rebuilding of the Ka‘ba could have caused inter-clan violence. Muhammad’s ﷺ solution demonstrated practical wisdom, shared honour and accepted arbitration before prophethood.

c. 605 CE Narrative and significance Paper 1 · Question 3

About 40 minutes Lesson 6 of 28 in this module

Syllabus connection
  • P1.T3.b1 The main events of the Prophet's life from his birth to his call to prophethood

Learn the material

Learning objectives

Key vocabulary

Hajar al-Aswad
The Black Stone set into the eastern corner of the Ka‘ba.
arbitrator
A trusted person who helps settle a dispute.
clan
A branch within a tribe.
rebuilding
Constructing again after damage.
shared honour
A solution that allows several parties to participate without humiliation.
Ka‘ba
The sanctuary in Makka.

Before you start

Answer from memory before opening the answers.

  1. Why was the Ka‘ba rebuilt?
  2. What caused the dispute?
  3. How was Muhammad ﷺ selected?
  4. What was his solution?
Check your answers
  1. It had been damaged and required reconstruction.
  2. Clans competed for the honour of replacing the Black Stone.
  3. They agreed to accept the next person to enter, and he appeared.
  4. Place the stone on a cloth, let clan leaders lift it together, then set it himself.

The lesson

Background and setting

When Muhammad ﷺ was about thirty-five, Quraysh rebuilt the Ka‘ba after damage. The work was divided among clans, but the honour of replacing the Black Stone produced a dangerous dispute.

Main events in sequence

  1. Quraysh agreed to rebuild the Ka‘ba using funds they considered lawfully earned.
  2. Different clans undertook sections of the construction.
  3. When the time came to replace the Black Stone, each clan wanted the honour.
  4. The dispute continued and threatened bloodshed.
  5. They agreed that the next person to enter the sanctuary area would arbitrate.
  6. Muhammad ﷺ entered and was welcomed as al-Amin.
  7. He placed the stone on a cloth and asked leaders of the clans to lift it together.
  8. He then placed it in position with his own hands.

Outcome and consequences

The solution prevented violence, preserved the dignity of the clans and confirmed his reputation for wise, impartial judgement.

Examination focus

The best response selects relevant detail, keeps a clear sequence and links each paragraph to the wording of the question.

Core knowledge for a developed answer
FeatureAccurate detailHow to use it
Problem Several clans claimed one honour. Identify the conflict clearly.
Selection The next entrant would arbitrate. Shows agreed process before the decision.
Trust The entrant was Muhammad ﷺ, already known as al-Amin. Connect reputation with acceptance.
Method Stone on cloth; clan leaders lifted together. Describe the practical mechanism.
Completion He placed the stone himself. Shows final responsibility with shared participation.

Accuracy and interpretation

The lesson is not evidence that every conflict can be solved by symbolic compromise. The principle is to identify interests, preserve justice and include parties without surrendering truth.

Context and chronology

Context and chronology
Date or phaseEventWhy it matters
c. 605 CE Flood or structural damage led Quraysh to rebuild. Provides the immediate context.
During construction Clans divided the work. Cooperation existed before the dispute.
At the Black Stone Competition threatened conflict. The turning point.
Arbitration Shared lifting and final placement. Violence was avoided.

Chronology control

Use dates to anchor the sequence, but do not turn the answer into a list of dates. The event, turning point and consequence must remain clear.

People, places and events

People, groups and places to know
Person, group or placeRole in this lesson
Muhammad ﷺ Accepted arbitrator and designer of the solution.
Quraysh clans Cooperated in rebuilding but disputed the final honour.
Clan leaders Lifted the cloth together.
Hajar al-Aswad The object at the centre of the dispute.
Ka‘ba The sacred building being reconstructed.

Qur'an and Hadith evidence

Use Qur’an and Hadith evidence briefly and purposefully. The evidence should illuminate the event or character point rather than replace historical knowledge.

وَجَعَلَ ٱللَّهُ ٱلْكَعْبَةَ ٱلْبَيْتَ ٱلْحَرَامَ قِيَامًا لِّلنَّاسِ

Allah made the Ka‘ba, the Sacred House, a means of support for people.

Qur’an 5:97

The Ka‘ba has communal significance beyond one clan.

فَأَصْلِحُوا بَيْنَ أَخَوَيْكُمْ

Make peace between your brothers.

Qur’an 49:10

The later Qur’anic principle matches the Prophet’s peacemaking conduct.

Short, accurate references are enough. Do not invent a quotation when you are uncertain of the wording.

Significance

  • His reputation made all sides willing to accept his judgement.
  • The solution addressed honour as well as the physical task.
  • Shared participation reduced humiliation and the risk of revenge.
  • He acted decisively without claiming the whole honour for his own clan.
  • The event foreshadows his later role as a just mediator.

Significance in practice

Build AO2 through example → principle → present-day application.

From the Prophet’s example to Muslim practice
Prophetic examplePrinciplePresent-day application
Inclusive problem-solving People cooperate when legitimate interests are recognised. A school leader can give each group a defined role in a shared project.
Neutral process Agreement on how a decision is made can reduce suspicion. Mediators should establish fair procedure before proposing an outcome.
Preventing escalation Early intervention can stop pride becoming violence. Community disputes should be addressed before public insults and factions deepen.
Shared dignity A settlement should avoid unnecessary humiliation. Restorative approaches can combine accountability with a path back into community.

Connections with other topics

Connections across the course
Connected topicHow the connection helps
P1-SIR-03 al-Amin His established trust explains why the arbitration was accepted.
P1-SIR-16 Constitution of Madina Later leadership also balanced different groups through agreed terms.
P1-SIR-20 Hudaybiyya Strategic compromise can secure a greater good.
P1-SIR-25 peacemaking The incident becomes an early model of consultation and conflict resolution.

Common misconceptions

Students often think Muhammad ﷺ simply took the honour for Banu Hashim.

In fact He designed a shared method and only completed the final placement.

Students often think The clans were fighting over ownership of the Ka‘ba.

In fact They disputed the honour of replacing the Black Stone.

Students often think The cloth solution was accidental.

In fact It was a deliberate way to include competing clans.

Students often think Compromise always means giving equal legitimacy to every claim.

In fact A good settlement protects justice while managing legitimate interests and dignity.

What the examiner wants

AO1: what you must know

For a high-level AO1 response, select detailed material that answers the precise focus and organise it coherently.

  • Know the brief background before the main event.
  • Quraysh agreed to rebuild the Ka‘ba using funds they considered lawfully earned.
  • Different clans undertook sections of the construction.
  • When the time came to replace the Black Stone, each clan wanted the honour.
  • The dispute continued and threatened bloodshed.
  • They agreed that the next person to enter the sanctuary area would arbitrate.
  • Muhammad ﷺ entered and was welcomed as al-Amin.
  • He placed the stone on a cloth and asked leaders of the clans to lift it together.
  • He then placed it in position with his own hands.
  • The solution prevented violence, preserved the dignity of the clans and confirmed his reputation for wise, impartial judgement.
  • Keep names, sequence and consequences accurate.

The narrative answer

Examiners reward brief background, then balanced coverage, then a clear link back to what the question actually asked.

Brief background
One or two sentences of context. Brief — this is not the answer.
Sequence
The main events in order, each with detail.
Balance
If the question names several things, give each comparable treatment.
Link back
Connect each part to the exact focus of the question.

AO1 control

Do not narrate everything you know about the Prophet’s life. Select the events that directly answer the question and develop them accurately.

AO2: what you must understand

AO2 must move beyond praise. Identify a principle, explain how the example establishes it, and show its effect on a Muslim or community today.

  • His reputation made all sides willing to accept his judgement.
  • The solution addressed honour as well as the physical task.
  • Shared participation reduced humiliation and the risk of revenge.
  • He acted decisively without claiming the whole honour for his own clan.
  • The event foreshadows his later role as a just mediator.

AO2 control

A present-day example earns value only when the mechanism is explained: what Muslims learn, why it matters and how it changes conduct.

Worked examination example

Weaker response

This event was important because the Prophet ﷺ showed good character and Muslims should copy him.

The point is generic, unsupported and could be attached to almost any event.

Stronger response

The method shows that leaders should understand the interests beneath a dispute. Muhammad ﷺ did not merely order the clans to stop arguing; he created a fair process that gave each side participation while preserving one final act of responsibility. Modern leaders can similarly combine inclusion, clear procedure and decisive closure.

The response identifies a precise example, derives a principle and explains its practical effect.

Practise

Guided practice

  1. Write a one-sentence background for The rebuilding of the Ka‘ba and the Black Stone.
  2. Select four events or features and arrange them in the most logical order.
  3. Add one sentence explaining the consequence or significance of each selected point.

Before you write, answer these

  1. Brief background
  2. Event or feature 1
  3. Event or feature 2
  4. Turning point
  5. Outcome and significance

The examination gives roughly a third of a page for a 4-mark answer. Aim for a short, dense paragraph — no introduction needed. Your work saves automatically in this browser.

Independent practice

  1. Write a balanced 10-mark account without notes.
  2. Write one developed 4-mark significance paragraph using example → principle → effect.
  3. Check every name, date and causal link against the lesson.

The examination gives roughly a third of a page for a 4-mark answer. Aim for a short, dense paragraph — no introduction needed. Your work saves automatically in this browser.

Check your understanding

Answer each question, then check it. Every option is explained — including the ones that are wrong — so read the feedback even when you were right.

1 What caused the dispute?

Multiple choice

2 Why did the clans accept Muhammad ﷺ?

Multiple choice

3 What did he place the stone on?

Multiple choice

4 What was the main result?

Multiple choice

5 True or false: Muhammad ﷺ simply took the honour for Banu Hashim.

True or false, with a correction

6 Give a developed account of one central feature of The rebuilding of the Ka‘ba and the Black Stone.

Build a paragraph

Mark your own answer

A good answer does these things:

One possible answer

During the rebuilding of the Ka‘ba, Quraysh clans disputed who would have the honour of replacing the Black Stone. The disagreement threatened violence. They agreed that the next person to enter would decide, and Muhammad ﷺ appeared. Because he was trusted as al-Amin they accepted him. He placed the stone on a cloth, asked clan leaders to lift it together and then set it in position himself.

Yours may be quite different and still be fully creditworthy.

7 Explain one lesson Muslims can draw from The rebuilding of the Ka‘ba and the Black Stone.

Specify the mechanism

Mark your own answer

A good answer does these things:

One possible answer

The method shows that leaders should understand the interests beneath a dispute. Muhammad ﷺ did not merely order the clans to stop arguing; he created a fair process that gave each side participation while preserving one final act of responsibility. Modern leaders can similarly combine inclusion, clear procedure and decisive closure.

Yours may be quite different and still be fully creditworthy.

Write a full answer

Exam-style practice question

This is original examination-style practice based on the syllabus topic and current assessment structure.

Exam-style practice question

(a) Give an account of the dispute over the Black Stone and how Muhammad ﷺ resolved it. [10] AO1

(b) What lessons can community leaders learn from his method of arbitration? [4] AO2

Written by this course to match the style and demand of the examination. It is not a Cambridge question.

Plan your answer

Before you write, answer these

  1. What brief context is needed?
  2. Which four to six points provide the strongest coverage?
  3. Where is the turning point or contrast?
  4. What consequence closes part (a)?
  5. Which specific example will drive each AO2 paragraph?

Out of scope here: Plan from the exact question. A memorised life story or general character paragraph will not automatically answer the focus set.

The examination gives roughly a third of a page for a 4-mark answer. Aim for a short, dense paragraph — no introduction needed. Your work saves automatically in this browser.

Indicative answer

Show an indicative answer Write yours first — you will learn more

Indicative answer — one valid response among many

Part (a)

During the rebuilding of the Ka‘ba, Quraysh clans disputed who would have the honour of replacing the Black Stone. The disagreement threatened violence. They agreed that the next person to enter would decide, and Muhammad ﷺ appeared. Because he was trusted as al-Amin they accepted him. He placed the stone on a cloth, asked clan leaders to lift it together and then set it in position himself.

Part (b)

The method shows that leaders should understand the interests beneath a dispute. Muhammad ﷺ did not merely order the clans to stop arguing; he created a fair process that gave each side participation while preserving one final act of responsibility. Modern leaders can similarly combine inclusion, clear procedure and decisive closure.

Why this would reach the top band

The answer is indicative, not a script to memorise. Equivalent accurate detail and well-reasoned applications may also be credited.

Other answers are equally valid

  • Marks are awarded for what is correct. Nothing is deducted for errors or omissions.
  • Credit is given for valid answers that go beyond the syllabus and the mark scheme.
  • It is entirely possible to reach the highest level using different information or a different argument from the one shown here.
  • Answers are judged against the levels of response, not against a checklist of required points.
Marking guidance reference

What the strongest answers do here: Read the response as a whole. Balance, accuracy, development and direct relevance determine the level.

AO1: Knowledge — part (a) questions — Recall, select and present relevant facts from the main elements of the faith and history of Islam.
LevelMarksWhat the examiner is looking for
48–10
  • A well-structured, clear and comprehensive response
  • Demonstrates extensive and accurate knowledge relevant to the question
  • Points are detailed, well-developed and relevant
  • Likely to quote Qur'an verses and Hadiths to support points made, or other relevant quotations
35–7
  • A well-structured and clear response
  • Demonstrates sound accurate knowledge which is relevant to the question
  • Points are elaborated upon and generally accurate
  • May quote Qur'an verses and Hadiths to support points made, or other relevant quotations
23–4
  • An attempt to present a structured response to the question
  • Response lacks cohesion or is undeveloped
  • Demonstrates some knowledge of the subject covering some of the main points but without detail
  • Points made are sometimes relevant and accurate but limited
11–2
  • Some attempt to answer the question
  • Lacks cohesion and structure
  • Demonstrates limited knowledge of the subject
  • Responses made are limited with little connection to the question
00
  • No creditable content

What moves an answer up: The clearest difference between Level 3 and Level 4 is comprehensiveness, development, and quotation. Level 3 "may quote"; Level 4 is "likely to quote".

AO2: Understanding — part (b) questions — Demonstrate understanding of their significance in the teachings of Islam and in the lives of Muslims.
LevelMarksWhat the examiner is looking for
23–4
  • Responses demonstrate a clear understanding of the question
  • Able to use own opinions to engage with the question and present reasoning that demonstrates their understanding
11–2
  • Responses demonstrate some understanding of the question
  • There are descriptive and factual references to the question with limited discussion of the material
00
  • No creditable content

What moves an answer up: The whole AO2 distinction is discussion versus description. A factually excellent but purely descriptive paragraph cannot reach Level 2.

Note that AO2 has two levels, not four. Some older textbooks and revision guides still show a four-level scale for part (b); that scale is out of date.

Self-assessment checklist reference

Judge your answer as a whole against the levels above, not by counting points. An answer can reach the top band using different material from the indicative answer.

Consolidate

Lesson summary

  • When Muhammad ﷺ was about thirty-five, Quraysh rebuilt the Ka‘ba after damage. The work was divided among clans, but the honour of replacing the Black Stone produced a dangerous dispute.
  • Quraysh agreed to rebuild the Ka‘ba using funds they considered lawfully earned.
  • Different clans undertook sections of the construction.
  • When the time came to replace the Black Stone, each clan wanted the honour.
  • The solution prevented violence, preserved the dignity of the clans and confirmed his reputation for wise, impartial judgement.
  • His reputation made all sides willing to accept his judgement.

Retrieval flashcards

Further revision task reference
  1. Create a five-point timeline from memory.
  2. Make a two-column grid: event/action and significance.
  3. Answer the lesson’s 4-mark question again using a different present-day example.

Before you write, answer these

  1. Five-point timeline
  2. Three precise details
  3. Two significance links
  4. One misconception to avoid

The examination gives roughly a third of a page for a 4-mark answer. Aim for a short, dense paragraph — no introduction needed. Your work saves automatically in this browser.

Your progress is saved in this browser only. Use My progress to export it if you change device.